Kristi Noem: Trump Will ‘Reform Ancient Weather System’ After Texas Flood Alert Failures

Following catastrophic floods in Central Texas that claimed dozens of lives, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem made waves of her own this week, vowing that Donald Trump—currently the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2024 election—will “reform the ancient weather system” that she claims failed the American people.

Speaking at a press conference in Austin on Sunday, Noem blamed what she described as “centuries-old government protocols and obsolete meteorological infrastructure” for the delayed alerts and inadequate flood preparation that left several communities underwater and caught thousands by surprise.

“We can’t keep relying on weather models that were written before smartphones existed,” Noem said, gesturing toward a damaged NOAA Doppler radar tower projected on a screen behind her. “President Trump understands this better than anyone. That’s why he’s going to reform this ancient weather system—once and for all.”

While her comments were met with confusion among some climate scientists, others say the failures in Texas do highlight a very real issue: the fractured and often outdated state of America’s emergency alert infrastructure.

The Texas Flood Crisis

Torrential rains on the evening of July 3 overwhelmed riverbanks across Central Texas, particularly along the Guadalupe and Llano rivers. In less than six hours, flash floods tore through summer camps, trailer parks, and suburban neighborhoods. By July 6, officials confirmed at least 52 deaths, with hundreds more evacuated and an estimated $2.4 billion in damages.

Local officials say that flood alerts came late—or not at all—for many in the affected areas. Cell phone emergency alerts failed to reach some residents due to poor signal coverage, while others received vague warnings long after the water had risen past critical levels.

One camp counselor from Kerrville, Maria Esparza, said, “We were checking the weather all day. No one told us to evacuate. Suddenly the river was in our cabins.”

What Did Noem Mean by “Ancient Weather System”?

While critics pounced on Noem’s phrasing—“reform the ancient weather system” trending for hours on social media—her team later clarified that she was referring to the outdated federal coordination between NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), FEMA, and local emergency systems.

Press secretary Amanda Culver issued a follow-up statement Sunday afternoon:

“Secretary Noem was referring to the antiquated coordination systems, not Mother Nature. Under President Trump’s future leadership, we will modernize meteorological data-sharing, rebuild our radar networks, and implement AI-powered flood response systems.”

Still, the wording gave late-night hosts plenty of material. On The Daily Wrap, comedian Ryan Talbot quipped, “Next, they’ll build a wall to keep out hurricanes and give it to the Pacific Ocean to pay for it.”

A Real Need for Reform?

Despite the ridicule, experts say Noem isn’t entirely off base—though her framing leaves much to be desired.

Dr. Hannah Koenig, a climatologist at Rice University, explained:

“We do have aging infrastructure. Some of our radar stations are 30–40 years old. Warning coordination between federal and local authorities is often inconsistent. It’s less about the science and more about the bureaucracy failing during high-speed weather events.”

Koenig pointed to Europe’s investment in real-time hydrological AI models and said the U.S. has lagged behind in applying predictive analytics to flooding, despite more intense storms fueled by climate change.

In 2023, Congress slashed NOAA’s modernization budget by 12%, citing spending caps. Many emergency management agencies rely on third-party weather apps instead of direct federal data feeds.

“The problem isn’t the weather system—it’s the system around the weather,” Koenig added.

Trump’s Weather Legacy

If Trump returns to the White House, it won’t be his first foray into meteorology. His administration previously drew criticism in 2019 for the infamous “Sharpiegate” incident, in which Trump altered a hurricane forecast map with a black marker. However, Trump supporters have praised his focus on infrastructure and deregulation, arguing that it cleared bureaucratic gridlock during disasters like Hurricane Laura in 2020.

Speaking from Mar-a-Lago over the weekend, Trump promised to “build the most advanced weather defense system the world has ever seen.”

“The weather has been treated like it can’t be fixed,” he said. “Wrong. Just like the border, just like NATO—we’re going to fix it. Rain, floods, hurricanes—we’re not going to let them win anymore.”

Democrats Respond

Democratic leaders blasted Noem’s remarks and Trump’s response as unserious and misleading.

Senator Alex Padilla (D-CA) tweeted:

“The idea of ‘reforming the weather’ is laughable, but the consequences of ignoring science and cutting preparedness budgets aren’t. Texas deserves answers and real investment, not campaign slogans.”

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called for a bipartisan review of FEMA and NOAA operations during extreme weather, warning against politicizing natural disasters.

Still, the damage has already rippled into the national discourse. With both presidential campaigns sharpening their narratives, floodwaters in Texas have turned into yet another arena for ideological combat.

What Comes Next?

As recovery efforts continue across Central Texas, FEMA has deployed emergency funds and personnel to assess needs. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security has initiated a formal review of emergency alert coordination protocols.

Noem says the review will include consultations with AI developers, meteorologists, emergency coordinators, and “data-first weather warriors.”

Whether her vision of a Trump-led “modern weather command system” ever materializes remains to be seen—but if nothing else, the tragedy in Texas has exposed critical vulnerabilities in the nation’s ability to respond to nature’s increasing volatility.

---