In a politically charged move with major environmental and economic implications, former President Donald Trump, now a leading voice in the Republican Party, has formally moved to block California’s pioneering plan to ban the sale of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035. The decision has reignited fierce debate over the balance of federal and state powers, the urgency of climate action, and the future of the American auto industry.
Background: California’s Bold Plan
California has long been at the forefront of environmental regulation in the United States. In 2020, then-Governor Gavin Newsom announced a sweeping executive order mandating that all new passenger vehicles sold in the state be zero-emission by 2035. The state’s air regulators followed through with detailed guidance in 2022, laying out a phased transition that would require increasing percentages of new car sales to be electric or hydrogen-powered.
The plan, backed by climate scientists and environmentalists, was seen as a bold step toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions in a state where transportation accounts for roughly 40% of carbon output. More than a dozen other states, including New York, Massachusetts, and Washington, signaled intentions to adopt similar rules based on California’s standards.
Trump’s Intervention
Now, in 2025, Trump—amid a strong political comeback—has taken aim at what he calls California’s “radical overreach.” In a press conference held in Phoenix, Arizona, he announced that his legal team and Republican allies in Congress had successfully pushed through a federal override of California’s authority to enact such a ban.
“Americans should be able to buy whatever car they want,” Trump declared. “No one in Washington or Sacramento should dictate that choice. We are putting an end to electric car mandates that kill jobs, raise prices, and limit freedom.”
The move was enabled through federal legislation introduced earlier this year that reasserts national standards for vehicle emissions and sales. It specifically prohibits states from banning internal combustion engine vehicles outright, arguing that such bans interfere with interstate commerce and consumer choice.
The Legal Battlefield
Trump’s actions have triggered a flurry of lawsuits and countermeasures. California Attorney General Rob Bonta immediately vowed to fight the decision in court, arguing that the Clean Air Act gives California special authority to set stricter emissions standards due to its historical air quality challenges.
“This is not just an attack on California. It’s an attack on every state’s right to protect the health of its people and its environment,” Bonta said in a statement. “We will challenge this reckless rollback with every legal tool we have.”
Environmental groups have also joined the fray. The Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and other organizations filed amicus briefs in support of California’s authority. They argue that the Trump-aligned rollback threatens progress on national climate goals and undermines years of coordinated planning between federal and state agencies.
Industry Reaction: A Divided Response
The auto industry, which has been navigating a bumpy transition toward electric vehicles (EVs), offered a mixed response. Some automakers—especially those heavily invested in EVs like Ford, General Motors, and Tesla—expressed concern that the rollback could create a patchwork of regulations and market uncertainty.
“Automakers need consistency and long-term policy clarity,” said Mary Barra, CEO of General Motors. “We remain committed to an all-electric future, but we urge policymakers to work together rather than undermine progress.”
On the other hand, legacy manufacturers with slower EV adoption curves—such as Stellantis and some Japanese automakers—welcomed the Trump decision, citing the high costs of rapid electrification and consumer hesitation.
Oil and gas companies, predictably, cheered the move. The American Petroleum Institute issued a statement praising Trump for “defending consumer choice and protecting American energy independence.”
Environmental Stakes
The implications of this policy reversal are immense. According to data from the California Air Resources Board, the state’s gas vehicle ban was expected to reduce emissions by 50% from 2026 levels by mid-century. Experts fear that Trump’s intervention could not only delay emissions reductions but also embolden other states to abandon their climate goals.
“Blocking California’s clean car standards is a disaster for public health, climate progress, and innovation,” said Leah Stokes, a climate policy professor at UC Santa Barbara. “This move could set us back a decade.”
California has some of the worst air pollution in the U.S., with Los Angeles frequently topping the list for smog. Environmentalists argue that aggressive vehicle standards are not just about climate change—they’re essential for protecting human health, especially in low-income communities near highways and industrial corridors.
Political Fallout
The fight over California’s vehicle ban is emerging as a central issue in the 2026 midterm elections. Democrats are using the rollback as a rallying cry to mobilize young voters and environmental advocates, while Republicans frame the decision as a victory for freedom and economic pragmatism.
Polls show a deeply divided electorate. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 61% of Americans support phasing out gas-powered vehicles over time, but only 39% favor a hard deadline like 2035. Support is strongest among younger voters and those in urban areas, while opposition is concentrated in rural and industrial regions.
What Comes Next?
As lawsuits move through the courts and political campaigns heat up, the future of vehicle emissions regulation remains uncertain. If Trump or a Republican-led Congress continues to shape federal policy, California’s leadership on environmental issues could be curtailed for years.
Yet state officials remain defiant. “California has always led the nation,” said Governor Eleni Kounalakis. “We won’t back down from protecting the air our children breathe and the planet they’ll inherit.”